In prioritizing care, which aspect is least urgent for a client with a skin rash?

Prioritizing care involves identifying actions based on their urgency and impact on the client's overall condition. In the case of a client with a skin rash, monitoring vital signs at intervals is considered the least urgent in comparison to the other options.

The other choices involve directly addressing the potential complications or management of the skin rash itself. Assessing the extent of the rash is important for understanding its severity and guiding treatment. Checking for signs of infection is critical because a skin rash, especially if it is extensive or worsening, could potentially lead to complications like a secondary infection. Administering the recommended topical treatment is essential for managing the rash and alleviating symptoms.

In contrast, while monitoring vital signs is an important aspect of overall patient care, it is less directly related to the immediate need for addressing the skin rash. Vital signs can provide general information about the client's health status but do not provide specific insights into the management of the rash itself. Therefore, focusing on the rash and its immediate implications takes precedence over routine monitoring of vital signs in this context.